This text presents physician \u00c9ric Kariger\u2019s version of the highly mediatised \u2018Vincent Lambert affair\u2019, a legal and media storm that followed the decision of Lambert\u2019s palliative care team to withdraw the intravenous nutrition and hydration that was artificially sustaining his life. Vincent was a psychiatric nurse who was left in a paraplegic state following a road traffic collision in 2008. Despite several years of interventions by various medical teams, it was deemed that there was no reasonable hope of Vincent\u2019s condition improving. This sparked a series of multidisciplinary meetings to establish whether the continuation of life sustaining interventions constituted \u2018unreasonable obstinacy\u2019, and, as per the provisions of the 2005 Loi Leonetti, should therefore be withdrawn. Kariger spends significant time explaining the process that led to the team\u2019s decision to withdraw support measures, with a clear desire to demonstrate that due process had been followed. The media frenzy began when Vincent\u2019s parents discovered not only the medical team\u2019s decision, but that life-sustaining interventions had been withdrawn without their knowledge. Kariger accepts that this was a failing, though not a legal one, as Vincent\u2019s wife, Rachel (his next of kin), had been informed about the meetings\u2019 outcome and that the life-sustaining interventions would be withdrawn. The decision to withdraw nutrition and hydration was completely antithetical to the \u2018fundamentalist\u2019 Catholic beliefs \u2013 as Kariger describes them \u2013 of Vincent\u2019s parents, who brought charges against him for attempted murder and reported him to the national governing body for physicians in France. The criminal proceedings were eventually dropped; however, an injunction forced Kariger to reconnect life-sustaining measures 31 days after their withdrawal. Subsequent multidisciplinary meetings reached the same conclusion, that life-sustaining treatment should be withdrawn; however, further legal proceedings by Vincent\u2019s parents blocked attempts to do so, and Kariger eventually resigned as head of the unit in which Vincent was hospitalised. The text presents clearly and logically Kariger\u2019s version of this story, beginning with the circumstances that led to Vincent\u2019s hospitalization, through the various stages of the \u2018affair,\u2019 and their impact on Kariger and his colleagues. The text also seeks to help the public \u2018get to know\u2019 Kariger: a chapter focuses entirely on his life story, drawing out the various experiences that have made him the man he is and forged his professional identity, including the role of faith in his life and work.<\/p>
The text\u2019s preface, by journalist Philippe Demenet, provides a re-cap of the \u2018Vincent Lambert affair\u2019, points to the importance of Kariger\u2019s faith \u2013 contrasted with the \u2018fundamentalist\u2019 views of Vincent\u2019s parents from the outset \u2013 and emphasises Kariger\u2019s strict adherence to the Loi Leonetti. This preface establishes the primary aims of the text: in an echo of Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Chaussoy\u2019s text on the \u2018Vincent Humbert affair\u2019 (see related entries below), this text clearly seeks to clear Kariger\u2019s name in the courts of public opinion by presenting his version of the story and humanising him, not least by highlighting the extreme abuse (including death threats) he received. The main body of the text is structured into four chapters, three of which focus on the \u2018Vincent Lambert affair\u2019 and one \u2013 the third, interestingly \u2013 recounts aspects of Kariger\u2019s life, focusing on events that shaped his personal and professional values. The decision to structure the text like this \u2013 with a condensed version of Kariger\u2019s life story interrupting the narrative two-thirds of the way through \u2013 has an important aesthetic impact, deepening the reader\u2019s empathy for the physician. Indeed, the chapter in which Kariger presents his case offers something vaguely reminiscent of the character statements used in court. The main body of the text is structured in question-and-answer style, with questions posed by Philippe Demenet; however, there is a noticeable shift in Chapter 4, where the questioning takes on more of a legal tone, almost as if Kariger were on the stand, presenting evidence to justify his actions. While hints of this justificatory tone appear earlier, as Demenet probes potentially controversial statements made by Kariger, this tone becomes more sustained in this final chapter, which concludes with a recapitulation of the facts of the \u2018case\u2019, leaving no doubt about the legality of the decisions taken by Kariger and his team. Kariger\u2019s voice is likewise key: this is very much his version of the Vincent Lambert story, and the text is as personally reflective as it is factual. There is also a clear desire to present Kariger as a reasonable man, with a well thought-through, logical and compassionate approach to issues; the tone of his answers plays an important role in this. So too does his discussion of his personal faith, which is not only present thematically, but also informs his language \u2013 when he describes Vincent as a \u2018martyr\u2019, for example. The final section, which opens with a chronological overview from 29 September 2008 until 7 January 2015, when the case was discussed at the European Court of Human Rights (judgement of the court provided in legal citations below), adds a further aesthetic dimension. The section continues with a summary of end-of-life laws in France, including discussion of what would eventually become the Loi Claeys-Leonetti (2016), regarding palliative sedation, and of patients\u2019 rights at the end of life. Following this discussion of the legal context and associated rights, there are a few pages on the role and significance of advance directives, and their potential limitations. Interestingly, Kariger provides a template for writing one\u2019s own advance directive, which shifts the text even further into the realm of the legal. Next comes a reproduction of Article 37 of the French Code of Medical Ethics, emphasising the responsibilities of physicians in end-of-life situations. As with the legal-style argumentation of the final pages of the text\u2019s main body, this weight of evidence \u2013 the laying out of chronology, laws, rights, professional guidance \u2013 points the reader once again to the legal background to the text and to the pending decision from the European Court of Human Rights, actively under consideration at the time of the text\u2019s publication. Although the court ruled in favour of Kariger\u2019s team and the hospital, this text offers something of Kariger\u2019s own verdict on the events: this is his truth, regardless of what the eventual legal outcome would be. The text concludes with copies of original correspondence, including anonymous letters that address Kariger as \u2018the executioner\u2019 and accuse him of being a Nazi, alongside letters of support from the Sisters of Charity, the Movement for Christian Retirees, and his own team. The decision to reproduce handwritten correspondence offers a helpful reminder of the highly personal nature of the backlash Kariger faced. The two examples of abuse mail that appear here are referenced elsewhere in the text, but their reproduction in the handwriting of their authors, has a significantly more visceral impact on the reader.<\/p>
The Vincent Lambert story, alongside that of Vincent Humbert, is one of the most significant end-of-life stories in France. Indeed, where Vincent Humbert\u2019s story led to the passing of the 2005 Loi Leonetti, Vincent Lambert\u2019s story can likewise be seen to have played an important role in debates surrounding the introduction of the Loi Claeys-Leonetti in 2016 (French Deputy Olivier Falorni says as much in the introduction to his Rapport fait au nom de la Commission des affaires sociales sur la proposition de loi donnant le droit \u00e0 une fin de vie libre et choisie, no. 4042, 2021), and subsequently, in discussions regarding advance directives. Kariger\u2019s text also presents an interesting and important point in the context of this Archive: the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions is not the same as assisted dying. Indeed, despite Lambert\u2019s case being widely cited in debates regarding the legalisation of assisted dying in France (high double figures in both the Assembl\u00e9e nationale and S\u00e9nat), and the significant criticism Kariger faced from Catholic groups (see Interest group citations below), he did not participate in \u2018active euthanasia\u2019 (i.e. deliberate intervention by a healthcare professional to end an individual\u2019s life). Kariger, for his part, remains resolutely against the legalisation of assisted dying and argues that the \u2018unreasonable obstinacy\u2019 evident in Vincent\u2019s case justifies \u2013 even if inadvertently \u2013 the autonomy-based case for the legalisation of the practice. Throughout the text, Kariger is clear that he wants to achieve a balance between the right to life and the right to a dignified life without \u2018unreasonable obstinacy\u2019; for him, this is found in adherence to the principles of the Loi Leonetti (2005). In narrating various legal decisions, and engaging with the ideas contained in the legal text of what would become the Loi Claeys-Leonetti (2016), the text offers valuable insights into the interaction between judicial decisions and the practice of medicine. The text further offers an intriguing discussion of the important distinction Kariger sees between palliative sedation and assisted dying, one still held by the majority of palliative care physicians: intent. In such an approach, Kariger advocates moving beyond what he describes as a pro-life, pro-euthanasia binary, in search of end-of-life practice that prioritises the best interests of the patient (all the while maintaining his clear stance against the legalisation of assisted dying). Nonetheless, the fact that Kariger has been called to give evidence in the context of the palliative care and assisted dying bills currently making their way through the French parliament attests to the significant role he played in Vincent Lambert\u2019s case, and to his broader expertise in the area.<\/p>","cover":{"ratio":1.5,"url":"https:\/\/assistedlab.ch\/media\/pages\/textual\/ma-verite-sur-l-affaire-vincent-lambert-by-eric-kariger\/e93169992d-1779286497\/cedh_affaire_vincent_lambert_strasbourg_5_juin_2015-1-2410x-q90.jpg","caption":"\u00a9 Claude Truong-Ngoc \/ Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0"},"data":[{"title":"Title","value":"\u2018Ma v\u00e9rit\u00e9 sur l\u2019affaire Vincent Lambert\u2019 by \u00c9ric Kariger"},{"title":"Author","value":"\u00c9ric Kariger (with Philippe Demenet)"},{"title":"Year","value":"2015"},{"title":"Language","value":"French"},{"title":"Legislative Context","value":"Loi no 2005-370 relative aux droits des malades et \u00e0 la fin de vie, 2005 (Loi Leonetti)"},{"title":"Tags","value":"High Profile Cases \u2022 Palliative Care \u2022 Family Resistance"},{"title":"Legislative context","value":"Loi no 2005-370 relative aux droits des malades et \u00e0 la fin de vie, 2005 (Loi Leonetti) (France)"},{"title":"Author of entry","value":"Jordan McCullough"},{"title":"Last updated","value":"26.06.2026 at 10:42"}],"toggles":[{"title":"Media citations","list":[{"text":"Guillaume L\u00e9vy, \u00c9lu, m\u00e9decin, militant: ils r\u00e9agissent \u00e0 l\u2019aide \u00e0 mourir voulue par Emmanuel Macron, L\u2019Union, 2024","link":"https:\/\/www.lunion.fr\/id578633\/article\/2024-03-13\/elu-medecin-militant-ils-reagissent-laide-mourir-voulue-par-emmanuel-macron","pathname":"lunion.fr"},{"text":"Isabelle Forboteaux, Fin de vie. \u2018Je n\u2019ai pas besoin de la loi si un jour j\u2019ai besoin de lib\u00e9rer un patient d\u2019une souffrance\u2019, t\u00e9moigne le m\u00e9decin de Vincent Lambert, France 3 (Grand Est), 2023","link":"https:\/\/france3-regions.franceinfo.fr\/grand-est\/marne\/reims\/fin-de-vie-je-n-ai-pas-besoin-de-la-loi-si-un-jour-j-ai-besoin-de-liberer-un-patient-d-une-souffrance-temoigne-le-medecin-de-vincent-lambert-2746286.html","pathname":"france3-regions.franceinfo.fr"},{"text":"Eric Kariger: \u2018D\u00e9p\u00e9naliser l\u2019euthanasie, c\u2019est casser une digue de protection\u2019, L\u2019Union, 2023","link":"https:\/\/www.lunion.fr\/id471234\/article\/2023-04-01\/eric-kariger-depenaliser-leuthanasie-cest-casserune-digue-de-protection","pathname":"lunion.fr"},{"text":"Docteur \u00c9ric Kariger: \u2018Ce sujet de la finitude provoqu\u00e9e reste hautement politique\u2019, L\u2019Est \u00e9clair, 2021","link":"https:\/\/www.lest-eclair.fr\/id244526\/article\/2021-03-28\/docteur-eric-kariger-ce-sujet-de-la-finitude-provoquee-reste-hautement-politique","pathname":"lest-eclair.fr"},{"text":"Samuel Ribot, Eric Kariger, ancien m\u00e9decin de Vincent Lambert: \u2018Ceux qui exploitent cette trag\u00e9die familiale n\u2019ont aucune excuse\u2019, La D\u00e9p\u00eache, 2019","link":"https:\/\/www.ladepeche.fr\/2019\/05\/21\/eric-kariger-ancien-medecin-de-vincent-lambert-ceux-qui-exploitent-cette-tragedie-familiale-nont-aucune-excuse,8213260.php","pathname":"ladepeche.fr"},{"text":"Dr Kariger: \u2018Mon seul regret est de voir toujours Vincent Lambert, ses proches et mon ancienne \u00e9quipe \u00eatre otages de la situation\u2019, L\u2019Ardennais, 2018","link":"https:\/\/www.lardennais.fr\/art\/114289\/article\/2018-09-28\/dr-kariger-mon-seul-regret-est-de-voir-toujours-vincent-lambert-ses-proches-et","pathname":"lardennais.fr"},{"text":"Delphine de Mallevo\u00fce, Affaire Vincent Lambert: les parents bient\u00f4t re\u00e7us par un juge d\u2019instruction, Le Figaro, 2017","link":"https:\/\/www.lefigaro.fr\/actualite-france\/2017\/01\/13\/01016-20170113ARTFIG00337-affaire-vincent-lambert-les-parents-bientot-recus-par-un-juge-d-instruction.php","pathname":"lefigaro.fr"},{"text":"Arnaud Bizot, Eric Kariger, le m\u00e9decin de Vincent Lambert, r\u00e9agit, Paris Match, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.parismatch.com\/Actu\/Societe\/Texte-sur-la-fin-de-vie-Eric-Kariger-Vincent-Lambert-Un-equilibre-entre-les-droits-du-patient-et-les-devoirs-du-medecin-722662","pathname":"parismatch.com"},{"text":"Jean-Yves Nau, Affaire Vincent Lambert: o\u00f9 est la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e9trange Dr Eric Kariger?, Slate, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.slate.fr\/story\/96605\/vincent-lambert-eric-kariger","pathname":"slate.fr"},{"text":"Samuel Ribot, La Grande Interview d\u2019\u00c9ric Kariger: \u2018Le soin palliatif est aujourd\u2019hui un grand d\u00e9sert intellectuel\u2019, France-Antilles, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.guadeloupe.franceantilles.fr\/divers\/la-grande-interview-deric-kariger-le-soin-palliatif-est-aujourdhui-un-grand-desert-intellectuel-290781.php","pathname":"guadeloupe.franceantilles.fr"},{"text":"Eric Turpin, Affaire Vincent Lambert: le docteur Eric Kariger livre sa v\u00e9rit\u00e9, France Bleu (Ici), 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.ici.fr\/infos\/societe\/affaire-vincent-lambert-le-docteur-eric-kariger-livre-sa-verite-1420615800","pathname":"ici.fr"},{"text":"Delphine de Mallevo\u00fce, Les extraits du livre choc du m\u00e9decin de Vincent Lambert, Le Figaro, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.lefigaro.fr\/actualite-france\/2015\/01\/07\/01016-20150107ARTFIG00041-les-extraits-du-livre-choc-du-medecin-de-vincent-lambert.php","pathname":"lefigaro.fr"},{"text":"\u2018Les confidences du m\u00e9decin de Vincent Lambert\u2019, Le Parisien, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.leparisien.fr\/societe\/les-confidences-du-medecin-de-vincent-lambert-07-01-2015-4425465.php","pathname":"leparisien.fr"},{"text":"Eric Kariger: \u2018Vincent Lambert est condamn\u00e9 \u00e0 vivre une vie qu\u2019il n\u2019a pas souhait\u00e9e\u2019, France Inter, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.radiofrance.fr\/franceinter\/podcasts\/l-invite-de-7h50\/eric-kariger-vincent-lambert-est-condamne-a-vivre-une-vie-qu-il-n-a-pas-souhaitee-7295475","pathname":"radiofrance.fr"},{"text":"Eric Favereau, La confession embarrassante du m\u00e9decin qui a rebranch\u00e9 le patient, Lib\u00e9ration, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.liberation.fr\/societe\/2015\/01\/07\/la-confession-embarrassante-du-medecin-qui-a-rebranche-le-patient_1175700\/","pathname":"liberation.fr"},{"text":"Ir\u00e8ne Inchausp\u00e9, Eric Kariger, m\u00e9decin de Vincent Lambert, livre \u2018sa v\u00e9rit\u00e9\u2019, L\u2019Opinion, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.lopinion.fr\/politique\/eric-kariger-medecin-de-vincent-lambert-livre-sa-verite","pathname":"lopinion.fr"},{"text":"Violaine de Montclos, \u2018Je savais que rien n\u2019arr\u00eaterait les parents de Vincent Lambert\u2019, Le Point, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.lepoint.fr\/societe\/je-savais-que-rien-n-arreterait-les-parents-de-vincent-lambert-06-01-2015-1894405_23.php","pathname":"lepoint.fr"},{"text":"\u00c0 bout, le m\u00e9decin de Vincent Lambert quitte ses fonctions, Le Figaro, 2014","link":"https:\/\/www.lefigaro.fr\/actualite-france\/2014\/08\/29\/01016-20140829ARTFIG00144--bout-le-medecin-de-vincent-lambert-quitte-ses-fonctions.php","pathname":"lefigaro.fr"},{"text":"Scott Sayare, French Families Challenge Doctors on Wrenching End-of-Life Decisions, The New York Times, 2014","link":"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2014\/08\/01\/world\/europe\/french-families-challenge-doctors-on-wrenching-end-of-life-decisions-medicalized-hospital-deaths.html","pathname":"nytimes.com"}]},{"title":"Interest Group citations","list":[{"text":"J\u00e9r\u00e9my Budzynowski, Rapports des d\u00e9l\u00e9gations: Val-de-Marne, Journal de l\u2019ADMD, n 161, 2025","link":"https:\/\/www.admd.org\/sites\/default\/files\/2025-06\/Journal%20n%C2%B0161%20de%20l%27ADMD.pdf","pathname":"admd.org"},{"text":"Michel Janva, Si le CHU de Reims a gard\u00e9 puis tu\u00e9 Vincent Lambert, c\u2019\u00e9tait pour faire un exemple, cr\u00e9er un pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent, Le Salon Beige, 2020","link":"https:\/\/lesalonbeige.fr\/si-le-chu-de-reims-a-garde-puis-tue-vincent-lambert-cetait-pour-faire-un-exemple-creer-un-precedent\/","pathname":"lesalonbeige.fr"},{"text":"Christian Delahaye, Affaire Vincent Lambert: l\u2019Eglise catholique et la \u2018remontada\u2019 int\u00e9griste, Empreinte, 2019","link":"https:\/\/www.editions-empreinte.com\/post\/affaire-vincent-lambert-l-eglise-catholique-et-la-remontada-int%C3%A9griste","pathname":"editions-empreinte.com"},{"text":"Fran\u00e7ois-Xavier Rochette, La pr\u00e9sence de Vincent Lambert provoque l\u2019ire du Syst\u00e8me!, Rivarol, 2019","link":"https:\/\/www.lesalonbeige.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/3379-maquette.pdf","pathname":"lesalonbeige.fr"},{"text":"H\u00e9lo\u00efse Rambert, Vincent Lambert: son ancien m\u00e9decin, le Dr Kariger revient sur toute l\u2019affaire, Allo Docteurs, 2019","link":"https:\/\/www.allodocteurs.fr\/se-soigner-fin-de-vie-vincent-lambert-son-ancien-medecin-le-dr-kariger-revient-sur-toute-laffaire-27118.html","pathname":"allodocteurs.fr"},{"text":"Marie Lefebvre-Billiez, \u00c9ric Kariger: obstin\u00e9, mais pas trop, R\u00e9forme, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.reforme.net\/bioethique-les-protestants-et-la-fin-de-vie\/eric-kariger-obstine-mais-pas-trop\/","pathname":"reforme.net"},{"text":"Eric Kariger: \u2018Mes confr\u00e8res n\u2019auront pas \u00e0 vivre ce que j\u2019ai v\u00e9cu\u2019, Fr\u00e9quence m\u00e9dicale, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.frequencemedicale.com\/gyneco-obstetrique\/jdf\/1720-Eric-Kariger-Mes-confreres-n-auront-pas-a-vivre-ce-que-j-ai-vecu","pathname":"frequencemedicale.com"},{"text":"Comment un patron de m\u00e9decine a appliqu\u00e9 la loi Leonetti, le livre t\u00e9moignage du Dr Kariger, Le Quotidien du m\u00e9decin, 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.lequotidiendumedecin.fr\/archives\/comment-un-patron-de-medecine-applique-la-loi-leonetti-le-livre-temoignage-du-dr-kariger","pathname":"lequotidiendumedecin.fr"},{"text":"Michel Janva, Les proches de Vincent Lambert demandent de vrais soins, Le Salon Beige, 2014","link":"https:\/\/lesalonbeige.fr\/les-proches-de-vincent-lambert-demandent-de-vrais-soins\/","pathname":"lesalonbeige.fr"},{"text":"Jeanne Smits, Vincent Lambert: compte-rendu d\u2019audience devant le tribunal de Ch\u00e2lons-en-Champagne, Le blog de Jeanne Smits, 2014","link":"https:\/\/leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com\/2014\/01\/","pathname":"leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com"},{"text":"Jeanne Smits, Des questions autour de l\u2019ordonnance en faveur de la vie de Vincent Lambert, Le blog de Jeanne Smits, 2014","link":"https:\/\/leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com\/2014\/01\/","pathname":"leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com"},{"text":"Jeanne Smits, Victoire! La vie sauv\u00e9e de Vincent Lambert, Le blog de Jeanne Smits, 2014","link":"https:\/\/leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com\/2014\/01\/","pathname":"leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com"},{"text":"Jeanne Smits, Vincent Lambert a le droit de vivre, dit le tribunal, Le blog de Jeanne Smits, 2014","link":"https:\/\/leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com\/2014\/01\/","pathname":"leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com"},{"text":"Jeanne Smits, Vincent Lambert: nouvel arr\u00eat de mort, Le blog de Jeanne Smits, 2014","link":"https:\/\/leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com\/2014\/01\/","pathname":"leblogdejeannesmits.blogspot.com"}]},{"title":"Legal and Paralegal citations","list":[{"text":"Rapport fait au nom de la Commission des affaires sociales sur la proposition de loi, adopt\u00e9e par l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e nationale, visant \u00e0 garantir l\u2019\u00e9gal acc\u00e8s de tous \u00e0 l\u2019accompagnement et aux soins palliatifs, S\u00e9nat, n 266, 7 January 2026","link":"https:\/\/www.senat.fr\/rap\/l25-266\/l25-2661.pdf","pathname":"senat.fr"},{"text":"Rapport fait au nom de la Commission des affaires sociales sur la proposition de loi, adopt\u00e9e par l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e nationale, relative au droit \u00e0 l\u2019aide \u00e0 mourir, S\u00e9nat, n 264, Auditions, 7 January 2026","link":"https:\/\/www.senat.fr\/rap\/l25-264\/l25-2641.pdf","pathname":"senat.fr"},{"text":"Comptes rendus des d\u00e9bats en s\u00e9ance, Assembl\u00e9e nationale, XVII l\u00e9gislature, Session ordinaire de 2024-2025, Proposition de loi relative au droit \u00e0 l\u2019aide \u00e0 mourir, n 1100, 1364, Suite de la discussion d\u2019une proposition de loi, 22 May 2025 (Catherine Vautrin)","link":"https:\/\/www.assemblee-nationale.fr\/dyn\/17\/comptes-rendus\/seance\/session-ordinaire-de-2024-2025\/deuxieme-seance-du-jeudi-22-mai-2025","pathname":"assemblee-nationale.fr"},{"text":"Rapport fait au nom de la Commission sp\u00e9ciale charg\u00e9e d\u2019examiner le projet de loi relatif \u00e0 l\u2019accompagnement des malades et de la fin de vie, Assembl\u00e9e nationale, n 2634, Tome II, 18 May 2024","link":"https:\/\/www.assemblee-nationale.fr\/dyn\/opendata\/RAPPANR5L16B2634-t2.html","pathname":"assemblee-nationale.fr"},{"text":"Compte rendu de la Commission sp\u00e9ciale charg\u00e9e d\u2019examiner le projet de loi relatif \u00e0 l\u2019accompagnement des malades et de la fin de vie, Assembl\u00e9e nationale, n 7, Table ronde avec les acteurs du soin \u00e0 domicile, 23 April 2024 (\u00c9ric Kariger)","link":"https:\/\/www.assemblee-nationale.fr\/dyn\/16\/comptes-rendus\/finvie\/l16finvie2324007_compte-rendu","pathname":"assemblee-nationale.fr"},{"text":"Compte rendu de la Commission sp\u00e9ciale charg\u00e9e d\u2019examiner le projet de loi relatif \u00e0 l\u2019accompagnement des malades et de la fin de vie, Assembl\u00e9e nationale, n 7, Table ronde avec les acteurs du soin \u00e0 domicile, 23 April 2024 (Olivier Falorni)","link":"https:\/\/www.assemblee-nationale.fr\/dyn\/16\/comptes-rendus\/finvie\/l16finvie2324007_compte-rendu","pathname":"assemblee-nationale.fr"},{"text":"Compte rendu de la Commission sp\u00e9ciale charg\u00e9e d\u2019examiner le projet de loi relatif \u00e0 l\u2019accompagnement des malades et de la fin de vie, Assembl\u00e9e nationale, n 7, Table ronde avec les acteurs du soin \u00e0 domicile, 23 April 2024 (Didier Martin)","link":"https:\/\/www.assemblee-nationale.fr\/dyn\/16\/comptes-rendus\/finvie\/l16finvie2324007_compte-rendu","pathname":"assemblee-nationale.fr"},{"text":"Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, Les entretiens du contentieux du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat \u2013 5\u00e8me \u00e9dition, De nouvelles fronti\u00e8res pour le juge administratif, Dossier du participant, 18 December 2020","link":"https:\/\/www.conseil-etat.fr\/Media\/actualites\/documents\/2020\/12-decembre\/dossier-du-participant-colloque-18122020","pathname":"conseil-etat.fr"},{"text":"Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, D\u00e9cision de justice n 402472, 19 July 2017","link":"https:\/\/www.conseil-etat.fr\/fr\/arianeweb\/CE\/decision\/2017-07-19\/402472","pathname":"conseil-etat.fr"},{"text":"Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat and Cour de cassation, Droits et D\u00e9bats, L\u2019ordre public: Regards crois\u00e9s du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat et de la Cour de cassation, Dossier du participant, 24 February 2017","link":"https:\/\/www.conseil-etat.fr\/Media\/actualites\/documents\/reprise-_contenus\/colloques2\/201702_colloquece-ccass","pathname":"conseil-etat.fr"},{"text":"Tribunal administratif de Ch\u00e2lons-en Champagne, Le tribunal administratif de Ch\u00e2lons-en Champagne rejette la requ\u00eate de M. Fran\u00e7ois Lambert, Jugement n 1501768, 1501769, 9 October 2015","link":"https:\/\/chalons-en-champagne.tribunal-administratif.fr\/decisions-de-justice\/dernieres-decisions\/le-tribunal-administratif-de-chalons-en-champagne-rejette-la-requete-de-m.-francois-lambert","pathname":"chalons-en-champagne.tribunal-administratif.fr"},{"text":"Cour Europ\u00e9enne des droits de l\u2019homme, Affaire Lambert et autres c. France, Requ\u00eate n 46043\/14, Arr\u00eat, 25 June 2015","link":"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/fre#{%22languageisocode%22:[%22FRE%22],%22appno%22:[%2246043\/14%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-155264%22]}","pathname":"hudoc.echr.coe.int"},{"text":"Avis pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 au nom de la Commission des lois constitutionnelles, de l\u00e9gislation, du suffrage universel, du R\u00e8glement et d\u2019administration g\u00e9n\u00e9rale sur la proposition de loi, adopt\u00e9e par l\u2019Assembl\u00e9e nationale, cr\u00e9ant de nouveaux droits en faveur des malades et des personnes en fin de vie, S\u00e9nat, n 506, 10 June 2015","link":"https:\/\/www.senat.fr\/rap\/a14-506\/a14-5061.pdf","pathname":"senat.fr"},{"text":"Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, D\u00e9cision de justice n 375081, 24 June 2014","link":"https:\/\/www.conseil-etat.fr\/fr\/arianeweb\/CE\/decision\/2014-06-24\/375081","pathname":"conseil-etat.fr"},{"text":"Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, D\u00e9cision de justice n 375081, 14 February 2014","link":"https:\/\/www.conseil-etat.fr\/fr\/arianeweb\/CE\/decision\/2014-02-14\/375081","pathname":"conseil-etat.fr"}]}]}